ELEMENTARY VALUE
  • Home
  • About
  • Forum
  • Books
  • Tools
  • Contact

SEC proposal to halt the trading of Dark stocks

10/10/2019

4 Comments

 
The SEC is currently proposing a   rule  which would essentially stop all trading of 'non-reporting' companies on the OTC markets. This would be achieved by prohibiting brokers/dealers from providing quotations/offerings for these 'dark' stocks. The SEC has proposed this rule in the hopes of combating fraud and protecting retail investors.
The problem with this proposal is that it is unlikely to achieve the desired consequence of eliminating fraud. It will also likely have many unintended consequences.

The frauds on the OTC tend to be current in their reporting, they want to promote their stocks and fleece shareholders by selling them worthless shares. Going dark and making your stock more illiquid isn't a very good way to get gullible investors to buy your shares.

A common reason that firms go dark is simply to save money, filing and registration costs can run in excess of $1 Million per year.  A tiny company with a handful of employees can't afford those kinds of costs. 

Other firms may wish to remain in the dark to protect their business interests or trade secrets,   maybe they are majority owned by a founding family and don't see the need to waste money filing.  The list of reasons goes on.

Admittedly, sometimes management may want to remain in the shadows so they can pay themselves egregious salaries  or find other ways to live the good life at the expense of minority shareholders.

My answer to this is Caveat Emptor!

If the SEC goes through with this rule thousands of small investors, including myself, will see the value of our holdings in 'dark' companies seriously, and possibly permanently, impaired.

These aren't frauds, pump n' dumps or Chinese RTO's I'm talking about either.

There are a multitude of legitimate companies which have legally de-registered with the SEC. Many of which have been around for decades, provide financials to shareholders and pay regular dividends.   These include;

Hershey Creamery Co. (HRCR)
Pinelawn Cemetery (PLWN)
Beaver Coal Co (BVERS)
Northfield Precision Instrument Corp (NFPC)
Goodheart Wilcox Co. (GWOX)
Sonics and Materials Inc (SIMA)

I could list hundreds of such companies, all of which are real businesses that communicate with shareholders (Some more frequently than others) and provide financial statements.

A better approach for the SEC would be to;

a) Insist that all OTC companies provide annual  financial statements, either on the OTC website or on their own website.

b) Amend the 'shareholders of record' rule so that management can't use it to go dark and cut out minority shareholders

c) Provide a lower cost alternative for small company's to file  with the SEC  and OTC markets

I would urge all dark stock investors to contact the SEC if you have concerns over the proposed rule. You can go here to leave a comment.

If you wish to read comments posted by other investors you can find them here

My comment can be viewed here 


Thanks for reading,


David

Subject: File No. S7-14-19

From: David J Flood                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
October 8, 2019

Dear Sir/Madam,

I am writing to urge you to reconsider your proposed rule (S7-14-19) to block quotes for companies traded on the OTC markets which are not deemed as current in their information.
Whilst I appreciate and support the endeavors of the SEC to protect retail investors, increase transparency and fight fraud I do not believe the proposed rule with have the intended consequences and may in fact produce many unintended consequences.

A large number of retail investors, including myself, hold fractional ownership in 'dark' companies and the proposed rule would destroy the value of our investments. The majority of my capital is invested in 'dark' companies and my net worth would be virtually wiped out should this rule be enacted.

In short, should this rule be enacted it would be nothing short of catastrophic for me and the financial future of my family.


There are a multitude of legitimate companies trading on the OTC markets which are classed as 'dark'


PLWN, a well respected cemetery corporation which provides annual financial information to the New York department.


BVERS and CNWS, both of which are limited partnerships which have existed for decades, pay regular dividends, and provide limited partners with in-depth financial and corporate information on an annual basis.


NFPC which was founded in 1952 and provides shareholders with annual financial information.


HRCR (Hershey Creamery Co.), the famous American Chocolate and candy manufacturer which is a wonderful example of the American success story.


Many small companies have chosen to go 'dark' due to the high costs associated with the required filing etc, in some cases these costs can be in excess of $1 Million which is a large cost for a small company with a handful of employees.


The SEC provides these companies with a legitimate path to saving costs by filing a form 12g, this allows them to lower costs and ensure they can continue as a going concern whilst continuing to communicate with shareholders via the OTC markets website or their own company website.


Whilst researching companies which trade on the OTC markets I have found several hundred companies deemed as 'not current' which are, in my opinion, legitimate businesses with a strong commitment to transparency and shareholder communication.


Many of them are family owned firms and thus, their own interests are closely aligned with those of retail investors who own fractional ownership in their companies.


If I may, I would like to propose some potential alternative options for achieving what both the SEC and retail investors would like to see, a safer and more transparent trading environment where fraud and unnecessary opacity is discouraged.


a) Amend the terms of your 'shareholders of record' so that companies cannot exploit it to go 'dark' and then cease communicating with shareholders. At present only registered shareholders are deemed of record and those who own shares in street name are not counted individually.

Thus companies can claim they have fewer than 300 shareholders when in fact they may have many thousands.

b) Provide a lower cost alternative for those small companies which cannot afford the costs of full registration and filing. A lower cost option would encourage many firms to increase shareholder/investor communication and would in turn generate more revenue and earnings for brokers and market makers.


c) Allocate more funds toward educating retail investors about the risk of fraud and encourage them to contact the SEC to report any documented existences of fraud or suspicions of probable fraudulent activity.


I hope you will bear in mind all of the retail investors and small legitimate businesses who will be negatively impacted should rule S7-14-19 be passed and reconsider passing the current proposals in favor of an alternative approach which is conducive to both the SEC, retail investors and those legitimate companies which are classed as 'dark'.


Regards,


Mr. David J. Flood
4 Comments
Braxton Gann
10/10/2019 09:55:36 pm

This is preposterous. If the problem is shady management, then why propose a rule that makes shareholder activism virtually impossible?

#stopS7-14-19

Reply
David
10/10/2019 10:30:42 pm

Yes,

I completely agree. This will make it easier for management to screw minority shareholders.

The simple solution is to provide a lower cost alternative for filing, compel OTC firms to provide annual financials and change the 'shareholder of record' rule.

Reply
John link
10/23/2019 03:26:47 am

This new requirement is an excellent win to enrich corrupt insiders. Threaten or reverse split to delist/15G and not report so they can quickly scare off investors, go dark and steal valuable assets from the public.

Endless personal examples of dark companies that have thrived after going dark. My investment in DVLN.OB now DVLN.
The stock was trading for .10 to .15 per share with valuable real estate assets. They did a 7,500 for 1 reverse stock spilt and scared me to sell with multiple press releases that investors that dont sell will be unlikely to sell their shares. So I sold. The stock we quickly did its reverse split and dropped to around $750 a share. But weeks/months after the stock broke $3,000 then 5,000 and over 7,000 per share.
https://yhoo.it/2oFVQUr
https://yhoo.it/35nhQUu

The only reason it now trades at 3,000 is the costs associated with toxic waste from a strip mall purchased years ago in NJ.

You can see I was a big fan of the stock at .10 to .15 and wrote about the idea multiple times.
DVL Inc (DVLN.OB) ; Potential 5 bagger?
https://shadowstock.blogspot.com/2010/07/dvl-inc-dvlnob-potential-5-bagger.html
Mediocre Companies Selling at Cheap Prices

https://shadowstock.blogspot.com/2011/01/mediocre-companies-selling-at-cheap.html

Audited companies listing on major exchanges run the easiest and most profitable scams. SEC is another impotent government agency. They don’t care about following the law unless its convenient and offers free publicity to justify and grow their taxpayer funded budget.
BTW, DVLN reports once a year if you can find on their website. http://www.dvlninc.com/.

Reply
vani
3/23/2020 06:14:24 am

Sometimes in life there are genuine
shortcuts.
Shortcuts which can be life-changing
and in this case transform your wealth.
But even shortcuts require a level of
discipline and focus.
This opportunity is one such shortcut:
http://five-minute-profit-sites.net?SLLO541
It requires setting aside a minimum of
23 minutes a day.
That might sound like nothing but
in my experience most people struggle
to go 23 minutes without checking their
phone.
I want you to promise me something.
Go to this private page right now and
decide if this is the kind of shortcut
that fits with your lifestyle and mindset:
http://five-minute-profit-sites.net?SLLO541
The financial reward from this small
time investment could literally change your life.
Please let me know how you get on.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    David J. Flood

    UK based Investor. I focus
    ​on Net-nets, Pico/Nano caps, AIM/OTC/Dark stocks & Special Situations. Balance sheets & Long-range price charts are my guide. Looking for inflection points. Do not construe my blog as investment advice, always conduct your own due diligence.  Caveat Emptor!


    For updates enter your email address and hit subscribe


    RSS Feed



    Archives

    February 2023
    May 2022
    January 2022
    November 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    December 2020
    September 2020
    June 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    November 2018
    October 2018
    August 2018
    April 2018


    Categories

    All
    AFFY
    AWRY
    BVERS
    CDTI
    CWPS
    Dark Companies
    ECRO
    EESE
    ENET:AIM
    EQTL
    FULO
    GTC:AIM
    HDT:AIM
    HGPI
    HMGN
    IMUC
    IOF.L/IOFNF
    ITS.AIM
    LTRE
    MFCO
    MGAG
    MIRI:AIM
    MNO:AIM
    MYRX
    MYX:AIM
    NFPC
    NTIP
    NVTRQ
    ORGN
    PCOA
    PHSC.AIM
    PLWN
    Podcasts
    PPMT
    PSSR
    SPCB
    Svenda's Manual Of OTC Stocks
    SYEV
    TCN:AIM
    TTYP
    WSTL
    ZCOM


    BLOGS I FOLLOW

    No Name Stocks

    Svenda's Manual of OTC Stocks
    ​
    Caveat Emptor Stocks
    Leaven Partners
    OTC Adventures
    Nothing But Net Nets
    Clark Street Value
    Value Investing Blog
    Alpha Vulture
    Deep Value Investments
    OddballStocks
    Value Stock Geek
    Barel Karsan - Value Investing
    Shadow Stock
    Hidden Value
    Yet Another Value Blog
    Streets Of Value
    TES Optimal Value Investing
    The Bad Investor
    ​
    Undervalued Japan
    ​Liquidation Almanac
    ​
    Adventures in Capitalism
    White Chip Stocks
    Light Blue Value
    ​Global Investing Insight
    ​Mesaba Range Value
    The  Market Plunger
    Neto's Notes
    ​Battleship Investing Blog
    The Investment Long-List
    Oceania  Value
    Grahamian Value Digest
    Stock Speaking
    Canadian Value Stocks
    Analyzing Bargain Stocks
    MicroValue
    ​
    Hidden Gem Investing
                                                             © COPYRIGHT 2018-2021 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
  • Home
  • About
  • Forum
  • Books
  • Tools
  • Contact